This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Speech data inherently contains personally identifiable information. Anonymization strategies to obscure this while preserving essential characteristics all represent a tradeoff between privacy and utility. We examine this balancing act of modifying voice characteristics, masking identity, and eliminating identifiable content by showcasing challenges with the common techniques-generalization, suppression, anatomization, permutation, and perturbation-in the context of preserving utility for individual level speech data analyses in clinical research.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diaz‐Asper et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: