Key result
Ioversol and lidocaine linked to up to ~16-fold greater risk of serious drug-induced arrhythmia.
Why the study?
The prevalence and seriousness of drug-induced arrhythmia, as well as predictors associated with serious arrhythmia, needed investigation.
What are the prevalence, seriousness, and predictors of drug-induced arrhythmia in a nationwide adverse drug reporting system?
Observational
Yes
What are the prevalence, seriousness, and predictors of drug-induced arrhythmia in a nationwide adverse drug reporting system?
Effect estimate: ROR 16.490 (95% CI 3.589-75.772)
Antibiotics, chemotherapy, and iodinated contrast media are strongly associated with serious drug-induced arrhythmias in a Korean nationwide pharmacovigilance database.
This study aims to investigate the prevalence and seriousness of drug-induced arrhythmia and to identify predictors associated with the seriousness of arrhythmia. Drug-induced arrhythmia cases reported to the Korean Adverse Event Reporting System Database (KAERS DB) from January 2012 to December 2021 were investigated. A disproportionality test was performed to detect the association of the etiologic medication classes and types, along with patient demographic information, with the seriousness of drug-induced arrhythmia. Logistic regression was performed to investigate the predictors that increase the risk of serious arrhythmia. The most common etiologic agent for drug-induced arrhythmia was sevoflurane, whereas serious arrhythmia was most prevalent with narcotics. Antibiotics (reporting odds ratio (ROR) 4.125; 95% CI 1.438-11.835), chemotherapy (ROR 6.994; 95% CI 2.239-21.542), and iodinated contrast media (ROR 8.273; 95% CI 3.062-22.352) had a strong association with the seriousness of drug-induced arrhythmia. Among numerous etiologic agents, ioversol (ROR 16.490; 95% CI 3.589-75.772) and lidocaine (ROR 12.347; 95% CI 2.996-50.884) were more likely to be reported with serious arrhythmia. Aging and comorbidity, primarily cancer, are the most contributing predictors associated with serious arrhythmia. Further studies on the clinical significance of patient-specific predictors for the increased risk of serious drug-induced arrhythmia are warranted to promote drug safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Go et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Drug-induced arrhythmia. Various medications (e.g., antibiotics, chemotherapy, iodinated contrast media) was evaluated on Seriousness of drug-induced arrhythmia (ROR 16.490, 95% CI 3.589-75.772). Ioversol (ROR 16.490; 95% CI 3.589-75.772) and lidocaine (ROR 12.347; 95% CI 2.996-50.884) were strongly associated with serious drug-induced arrhythmia in a Korean nationwide database.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: