PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 9, 2015˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences27 citationsOpen Access

3d Reconstruction of an Underwater Archaelogical Site: Comparison Between Low Cost Cameras

ACAlessandro CapraMDMarco DubbiniEBEleonora Bertacchini

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract. The 3D reconstruction with a metric content of a submerged area, where objects and structures of archaeological interest are found, could play an important role in the research and study activities and even in the digitization of the cultural heritage. The reconstruction of 3D object, of interest for archaeologists, constitutes a starting point in the classification and description of object in digital format and for successive fruition by user after delivering through several media. The starting point is a metric evaluation of the site obtained with photogrammetric surveying and appropriate 3D restitution. The authors have been applying the underwater photogrammetric technique since several years using underwater digital cameras and, in this paper, digital low cost cameras (off-the-shelf). Results of tests made on submerged objects with three cameras are presented: © Canon Power Shot G12, © Intova Sport HD e © GoPro HERO 2. The experimentation had the goal to evaluate the precision in self-calibration procedures, essential for multimedia underwater photogrammetry, and to analyze the quality of 3D restitution. Precisions obtained in the calibration and orientation procedures was assessed by using three cameras, and an homogeneous set control points. Data were processed with © Agisoft Photoscan. Successively, 3D models were created and the comparison of the models derived from the use of different cameras was performed. Different potentialities of the used cameras are reported in the discussion section. The 3D restitution of objects and structures was integrated with sea bottom floor morphology in order to achieve a comprehensive description of the site. A possible methodology of survey and representation of submerged objects is therefore illustrated, considering an automatic and a semi-automatic approach.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Capra et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15d16a37103a4337a039a6https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-5-w5-67-2015
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Digital camera calibration methods: Considerations and comparisons2006 · 516 citations
  2. 2Application of underwater photogrammetry for the deformation control of submerged objects1994 · 2 citations
  3. 3Non-Conventional System in Underwater Photogrammetry1992 · 14 citations
  4. 4The interpretation of structure from motion1979 · 1,061 citations
  5. 5A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Algorithms2006 · 2,417 citations