This article examines the role of the discount rate in making decisions that will have significant implications for the environment. The authors begin by pro-viding a rationale for discounting in general and by describing the main factors that determine the discount rate. These factors—the private and social rates of time preference, the opportunity cost of capital, risk and uncertainty, and the interests of future generations—all have an environmental dimension. The ar-ticle goes on to examine that dimension and to explore the connections be-tween the choice of the discount rate and environmental concerns, such as excessive exploitation of natural resources, inadequate investment in conserva-tion, and insufficient attention to the irreversible loss of certain environmental resources. The authors conclude that, in general, environmental concerns are not best addressed by lowering the discount rate—an action that might have both ben-efits and costs for the environment. A more promising course would be to incorporate a criterion of sustainability into certain aspects of decisionmaking. How such a criterion could be made operational is touched upon but not de-veloped in this article. M any environmentalists fear that the use of discounting in formulatingeconomic policies that will affect the control and use of the earth'snatural resources may be against the interests of the natural envi-ronment. They contend that the higher the discount rate, the less long-run
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Markandya et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: