Control system analysis reveals fundamental trade-offs between transparency and robust stability in bilateral teleoperation, indicating four-channel architectures optimize delayed force feedback.
Tools for quantifying teleoperation system performance and stability when communication delays are present are provided. A general multivariable system architecture is utilized which includes all four-types of data transmission between master and slave: force and velocity in both directions. It is shown that a proper use of an four channels is of critical importance in achieving high performance telepresence in the sense of accurate transmission of task impedances to the operator. It is also shown that transparency and robust stability (passivity) are conflicting design goals in teleoperation systems. The analysis is illustrated by comparing transparency and stability in two common architectures, as well as a recent passivated approach and a new transparency-optimized architecture, using simplified one-degree-of-freedom examples.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dale Lawrence (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: