Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The subject of well-being has always excited human society. Various official and scientific research documents have sought to outline the design and content of well-being, but the specific definition depends on the conceptual approach employed: the process, system, or other aspect. The purpose of this research is to create an integrated, multi-component model that can ensure the continued well-being of modern man. The modern man can be defined with regard to two levels of well-being: internal (subjective) and external (objective). Inner well-being is seen as a human, spiritual well-being associated with one's personal characteristics and features. External well-being develops from the perspective of perception and one's evaluation of human society. Each level consists of four key contextual attributes that together constitute well-being: one's existence in accordance with their natural essence (in harmony with others and the environment); an innate understanding of what is good for oneself, and the presence of the ability and willingness to achieve it; one's the ability to realize their human potential and plan for life; the creation of a society and empowering people to fulfill the above stated positions 1, 2, 3, and increase activity and awareness. Such specification of the category “well-being” gives us an opportunity to distinguish between personal well-being of an individual and social well-being of member of society and state. Only discoursing in the framework of such conceptually comprehensive logic, it is possible to derive the “formula” of the well-being of human and society.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alatartseva et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: