Reinterpretasi Hadis Larangan Perempuan Bepergian Tanpa Mahram dan Larangan Melukis (Pendekatan Sosio-Historis dan Antropologis))

This article focuses on the interpretation of the prohibition of women traveling without mahram hadith and the prohibition on writing which is often understood textually as the editors of the hadith. The literature review method with descriptive qualitative analysis through contingent analysis of the perspective of the socio-historical and anthropological approaches used in this article. The findings of this study are: (1) The legislation of the ban on women traveling alone if they look at the historical context of the above hadith is security and propriety, the current contextualization is if the security of women traveling alone is guaranteed and women are deemed appropriate more taboo when traveling alone, it does not matter if women travel alone without mahram, (2) Rationes legis from prohibiting the painting of animate creatures, namely the fear of the emergence of shirk by worshiping paintings or sculptures as in the time of ignorance. This prohibition in the concept of usul fiqh can be categorized as sadd al-dzari'ah which is to cut the path of damage (mafsadah) as a way to avoid such damage, in other words it is an anticipatory step.