Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Do institutions designed to limit arbitrary government promote the survival of democratic regimes? Although the international effort to build the rule of law is predicated on a belief that they do, mainstream research on democratic survival typically treats institutions as epiphenomenal. We argue that institutions encourage regime survival by addressing problems of monitoring and social coordination that complicate democratic compromise. We find that property-rights institutions generally, and judicial institutions specifically, encourage survival, especially when macroeconomic conditions favor inter-class compromise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reenock et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: