This summary presents a proposed draft list of 35 critical minerals based on a comprehensive analysis of multiple criteria. The identified minerals, ranging from aluminum to zirconium, are considered crucial due to factors such as economic importance, national security, and environmental impact. Acknowledging the complexity of the issue, the document emphasizes the necessity of considering various factors in the identification and prioritization of critical minerals. The proposed list aims to serve as a valuable tool for stakeholders in understanding and addressing the challenges associated with mineral resource availability and strategic importance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fortier et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: