Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Let π1, π2, …, π k be k ≥ 2 sources of observations (treatments, populations) and suppose the “goodness” of treatment π i is characterized by the size of an unknown real-valued parameter θ i . Let θ[k] = max1≤i≤k θ i . If π i is preferred to π j when θ i > θ j , the parameters δ i = θ[k] — θ i , i = 1, 2, …, k reflect in an inverse sense the “goodness” of each treatment relative to the “best” treatment. A general technique for obtaining simultaneous confidence intervals on the δ i is demonstrated with several examples. This technique can be applied in any setting where comparison-with-control intervals can be computed regarding any π j as the control. These results have special importance in ranking and selection problems in that the process of generating upper bounds on the δ i generates traditional confidence statements of both the indifference zone and the subset selection schools, simultaneously, as established by Hsu (1981).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edwards et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: