PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 18, 1997Circulation186 citations

Pulsatile Stretch Stimulates Superoxide Production in Human Aortic Endothelial Cells

View Full Paper
KHKeiichi HishikawaTLThomas F. Lüscher

Key Result

Short-term pulsatile stretch increased superoxide production 2.2-fold in human aortic endothelial cells, while prolonged stretch upregulated NO production to scavenge superoxide.

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate how pulsatile stretch influences superoxide production in human aortic endothelial cells.
  • Human cultured aortic endothelial cells exposed to pulsatile stretch for up to 24 hours.
  • Short-term stretch was 10% elongation at 50 cycles per minute for 1 hour.
  • Evaluation of superoxide production and the role of various inhibitors.
  • Short-term stretch increased superoxide production 2.2-fold (p<0.05).
  • Prolonged stretch increased superoxide production after blockade of nitric oxide production (2.4-fold increase, p<0.05).
  • After 24 hours of stretch, NO synthase (III) protein and mRNA expression doubled.

Structured PICO

Does pulsatile stretch stimulate superoxide production in human aortic endothelial cells?

P
Population
Human cultured aortic endothelial cells
I
Intervention
Pulsatile stretch (10% average elongation, 50 cycles per minute) for up to 24 hours
C
Comparator
Unstretched cells
O
Outcome
Superoxide productionsurrogate

Pulsatile stretch stimulates superoxide production in human aortic endothelial cells, with prolonged stretch inducing a compensatory upregulation of NOS (III) to scavenge superoxide.

Main Result

Effect estimate: 2.2-fold increase

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Free radicals such as superoxide and nitric oxide (NO) play a key role in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. Mechanical forces such as pulsatile stretch may be involved in free radical production. We studied superoxide production by pulsatile stretch in human endothelial cells. METHODS AND RESULTS: Human cultured aortic endothelial cells were exposed to pulsatile stretch up to 24 hours, and superoxide production was examined. Short-term stretch for 1 hour (10% average elongation, 50 cycles per minute) increased superoxide production 2.2-fold. This effect was reduced by diphenyleneiodonium chloride, an NADPH oxidase inhibitor, but not by the xanthine oxidase inhibitor oxypurinol or the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin. Prolonged stretch up to 6 hours increased superoxide production, but it returned to near the control level after 24 hours of stretch. However, after blockade of NO production, 24 hours of stretch did increase superoxide production 2.4-fold compared with 24 hours of stretch alone. Moreover, 24-hour stretch doubled NO synthase (NOS) (III) protein and mRNA expression. The tetrahydrobiopterin synthesis inhibitor 2,4-diamino-6-hydroxypyrimidine had no effect on unstretched cells but doubled superoxide production compared with 24-hour stretch alone; this increase was halved by cotreatment with 6-methyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropterine, a lipid-soluble form of tetrahydrobiopterine. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term stretch increased superoxide production from human aortic endothelial cells via NADPH oxidase and NOS (III), whereas prolonged stretch increased both superoxide and NO production. The increase in NOS (III) protein with prolonged stretch acts as a scavenger mechanism whereby NO inactivates superoxide. Tetrahydrobiopterin determines the balance of superoxide and NO production from NOS (III) after prolonged stretch in which NOS (III) level is upregulated.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hishikawa et al. (1997) studied this question. Pulsatile stretch vs. Unstretched cells was evaluated on Superoxide production (2.2-fold increase). Short-term pulsatile stretch increased superoxide production 2.2-fold in human aortic endothelial cells, while prolonged stretch upregulated NO production to scavenge superoxide.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15ebedbda55c6836d124cehttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.96.10.3610
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper