The reconstruction of the cubic {β}-SiC(111) surface was studied after annealing at {~}1200 ^∘{}C. The surface consistently showed a 6 {}3 ×{}6 {}3 geometry when measured by low-energy electron diffraction (LEED) and a 6×{}6 geometry when imaged by scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). To resolve the discrepancy, we carried out first-principles calculations of the electronic structure of a surface model in which a graphite monolayer was incommensurately grown on top of the Si-terminated {β}-SiC(111) surface. The calculated energy band and density-of-states diagrams provide an explanation to the observed differences in LEED and STM results. They also explain the voltage-dependent contrast-reversal phenomenon observed in the STM images of the annealed surface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsai et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: