Key result
Myocardial biomarkers such as troponin-I and NT-proBNP provide added discriminatory value beyond established risk factors for predicting future cardiovascular events in the general population.
Why the study?
Do myocardial biomarkers add discriminative capacity beyond established risk factors for predicting cardiovascular events in the general population?
Do myocardial biomarkers add discriminative capacity beyond established risk factors for predicting cardiovascular events in the general population?
While the unmet need for new biomarkers in general population risk prediction is low, troponin-I and NT-proBNP provide added discriminatory value beyond established risk factors.
May refine risk prediction models; leaves open whether routine use improves outcomes or warrants practice change.
The identification of those persons in the population who have the highest risk of future cardiovascular events is important for targeting intensive preventive efforts. This can be reliably done using a handful of long since established risk factors. The unmet need for new molecular biomarkers for prediction of cardiovascular events in the general population is therefore low. In order for a new biomarker to be used clinically for risk prediction, a statistically significant association of levels of the biomarker to adverse outcome is not enough, but the biomarker should also be demonstrated to add discriminative capacity beyond established risk factors. In contrast to the limited value of new biomarkers for risk prediction, their usefulness for unraveling the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease is large. The myocardium is the source of a vast number of interesting biomarkers, of which a few may be useful for risk prediction in the general population. Two of these, troponin-I and the N-terminal fragment of brain natriuretic peptide, have passed tests of added discriminatory value. Numerous other biomarkers produced by cardiomyocytes or non-cardiomyocytes in the myocardium are promising, and if they are not proven useful for risk prediction, they will unquestionably enhance our understanding of cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johan Sundström (2009) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease. Myocardial biomarkers (troponin-I and NT-proBNP) vs. Established risk factors was evaluated on Prediction of cardiovascular events. Myocardial biomarkers such as troponin-I and NT-proBNP provide added discriminatory value beyond established risk factors for predicting future cardiovascular events in the general population.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: