Why the study?
Does AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia require participation of the entire AV node?
Does AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia require participation of the entire AV node?
Electrophysiologic findings in a single case suggest that AV nodal re-entry can persist without the participation of the upper part of the AV node.
Single-case data suggest AVNRT may persist without upper nodal participation; leaves open necessity of an upper common pathway.
Electrophysiologic studies in a case of AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia showed that a programmed atrial premature depolarization induced during the tachycardia did not change the tachycardia cycle but caused a delay in the following atrial echo. Analysis of such a phenomenon suggests that the atrial premature depolarization was conducted to the upper part of the AV node but not to the site of the re-entry. Therefore, AV nodal re-entry can persist without the participation of the upper part of the AV node. This case illustrates that the upper common pathway connecting the dual AV nodal pathways cranially is most likely located within the AV node and consists of AV nodal tissue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hariman et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: