This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In comparison with the Student t test, the test on the ranks of scores has been shown to be slightly less powerful than the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test conducted on the original scores for real smooth and symmetric data sets because it does not provide a correction for ties or continuity. Here it is demonstrated that the t test on ranks is nonetheless superior to the usual t test for real data that are skewed or otherwise severely nonnormally distributed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bridge et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: