Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Contrast analysis is a way to evaluate theories efficiently and relatively easily, but despite its efficiency, informativeness, and simplicity, contrast analysis is rarely found in the research literature. We present and illustrate step-by-step outlines of contrast procedures for 4 basic kinds of analyses, and we highlight the ways in which they provide focused information that complements more conventional analytic techniques such as omnibus analysis of variance-based F tests and count-based chi-squares. In addition, we provide examples of contrast analysis using 2 widely used statistical packages. We believe that the social sciences will profit if researchers, teachers, students, reviewers, and editors have a deeper understanding and appreciation of the advantages, informativeness, and ease of contrast analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Furr et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: