In the two-step version (Dmitrienko, Tamhane, Wang and Chen, 2006) of the Bonferroni parallel-gatekeeping multiple-testing procedure (MTP): (a) a family F1 of null hypotheses H is used as a gatekeeper for another family F2 in that no H in F2 can be rejected unless at least one H is rejected in F1; (b) a Bonferroni MTP is used for F1 at local multiple-level alpha in the first step; and (c) Holm's (1979) step-down MTP is used in the second step for F2 at a local multiple level that depends on the rejections made in the first step. It is shown in this article that this two-step procedure can be generalized in that any MTP with multiple-level control and available multiplicity-adjusted p -values can be used instead of Holm's MTP in the second step. A further generalization related to what Dmitrienko, Molenberghs, Chuang-Stein and Offen (2005) called modified Bonferroni parallel gatekeeping is also given where in case all H s in F2 are rejected, additional rejections in F1 can be made in a third step at local multiple-level alpha through any MTP that is more powerful than the initial Bonferroni MTP, e.g. Holm's MTP. The proofs that these two generalized Bonferroni parallel-gatekeeping MTPs have multiple-level alpha are short and direct, without closed-testing arguments. Multiplicity-adjusted p -values can easily be calculated for these MTPs. The extensions to several successive gatekeeper families are straightforward. An illustration is given.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olivier Guilbaud (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: