Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Healthcare analytics is often limited by data silos and strict privacy requirements, which make it difficult to share patient-level records across organisations and to build robust predictive models. Federated learning (FL) provides an alternative by keeping data local and exchanging model updates instead of raw records. However, many existing FL solutions remain difficult to deploy in healthcare settings, as they provide limited support for auditability, governance-oriented evidence, and system-level transparency. This paper presents MediVault, an auditable and security-aware federated learning-based system for privacy-preserving healthcare collaboration. MediVault combines round-based federated training, prototype-level protected update exchange, audit-ready telemetry, and an interactive dashboard that exposes non-sensitive evidence of collaboration, model progress, and protocol execution. In addition, the system supports controlled reporting to improve stakeholder communication during pilot deployments. We evaluate MediVault on two public healthcare classification datasets, Breast Cancer Wisconsin (Diagnostic) and Heart Disease, under IID and label-skewed Non-IID settings. Experiments are conducted using logistic regression, linear SVM, and an additional lightweight MLP under matched settings. The observed results suggest that federated training remains competitive with centralised training under the evaluated settings. A prototype-level overhead analysis further shows that protected update exchange introduces measurable computational and communication costs, especially for larger update vectors. These findings indicate that MediVault can support initial system-level validation of auditable, privacy-preserving healthcare FL workflows, while further work is needed for larger-scale deployment, stronger adversarial evaluation, and real-world clinical validation.
Li et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: