We developed a thyroid hormone (TH) inducible primary screening assay for the identification and assessment of man-made chemicals that interfere with the TH-signalling pathway within target cells. The assay was developed in a Xenopus laevis cell line that was transduced with a self-inactivating (SIN) lentivirus vector (LV) containing a luciferase gene. The luciferase activation in this cell line was TH-specific: 3,3',5-L-triiodothyronine (T(3)) > 3,3'5-L-triiodothyroacetic acid (Triac) > 3,3',5-D-triiodothyronine (D-T(3)), > L-thyroxine (T(4)) > 3,3',5'-L-triiodothyronine (rT(3)). The application of the ligand-dependent luciferase assay for screening for thyroid system-disrupting chemicals revealed that three phthalates (dicyclohexyl phthalate, n-butylbenzyl phthalate, and di-n-butyl phthalate), two herbicides (ioxynil and pentachlorophenol) and a miticide (dicofol) had 3,3',5-L-triiodothyronine- T(3)- antagonist activity at concentrations ranging from 10(-6) to 10(-5) M. These chemicals also inhibited the expression of the endogenous primary T(3)-response TH nuclear receptor beta (TRbeta) gene. The inhibitory characteristics of these chemicals were similar for both assays performed, although the assay for T(3)-dependent activation of TRbeta gene was more sensitive than the luciferase assay. These results indicate that the luciferase assay was a rapid method with a small intra-assay variation for the primary screening of thyroid system-disrupting chemicals. Of the six chemicals, only n-butylbenzyl phthalate and pentachlorophenol exhibited T(3)-antagonist activity in an in vivo metamorphosis-based assay. It should be noted that chemicals elicited thyroid system-disrupting activity in the luciferase assay did not always interfere with the thyroid system in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugiyama et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: