PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 13, 2010JAMA333 citationsOpen Access

Effect of Telecare Management on Pain and Depression in Patients With Cancer

View Full Paper
KKKurt KroenkeDTDale TheobaldJWJingwei Wu

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

CONTEXT: Pain and depression are 2 of the most prevalent and treatable cancer-related symptoms, yet they frequently go unrecognized, undertreated, or both. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether centralized telephone-based care management coupled with automated symptom monitoring can improve depression and pain in patients with cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized controlled trial conducted in 16 community-based urban and rural oncology practices involved in the Indiana Cancer Pain and Depression (INCPAD) trial. Recruitment occurred from March 2006 through August 2008 and follow-up concluded in August 2009. The participating patients had depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score > or = 10), cancer-related pain (Brief Pain Inventory BPI worst pain score > or = 6), or both. INTERVENTION: The 202 patients randomly assigned to receive the intervention and 203 to receive usual care were stratified by symptom type. Patients in the intervention group received centralized telecare management by a nurse-physician specialist team coupled with automated home-based symptom monitoring by interactive voice recording or Internet. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blinded assessment at baseline and at months 1, 3, 6, and 12 for depression (20-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist HSCL-20) and pain (BPI) severity. RESULTS: Of the 405 participants enrolled in the study, 131 had depression only, 96 had pain only, and 178 had both depression and pain. Of the 274 patients with pain, 137 patients in the intervention group had greater improvements in BPI pain severity over the 12 months of the trial whether measured as a continuous severity score or as a categorical pain responder (> or = 30% decrease in BPI) than the 137 patients in the usual-care group (P or = 50% decrease in HSCL) than the 155 patients in the usual care group (P < .001 for both). The standardized effect size for between-group differences at 3 and 12 months was 0.67 (95% confidence interval CI, 0.33-1.02) and 0.39 (95% CI, 0.01-0.77) for pain, and 0.42 (95% CI, 0.16-0.69) and 0.41 (95% CI, 0.08-0.72) for depression. CONCLUSION: Centralized telecare management coupled with automated symptom monitoring resulted in improved pain and depression outcomes in cancer patients receiving care in geographically dispersed urban and rural oncology practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00313573.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kroenke et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a163c93a2d9d2b88ec509d9https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.944
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Type I Error Rates from Mixed Effects Model Repeated Measures Versus Fixed Effects Anova with Missing Values Imputed Via Last Observation Carried Forward2001 · 162 citations
  2. 2Implementing national standards for cancer pain management: Program model and evaluation1996 · 162 citations
  3. 3The measurement of disability1996 · 1,433 citations
  4. 4Acute and Longer-Term Outcomes in Depressed Outpatients Requiring One or Several Treatment Steps: A STAR*D Report2006 · 5,650 citations
  5. 5Oncologists' recognition of depression in their patients with cancer.1998 · 591 citations