Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aim: In the 21st century era where academic research boundaries are increasingly blurred by technological innovations, it is critical to understand postgraduate students' willingness to embrace Generative AI as a research ally to reshape their scholarly work and lift their academic writing experience to newer heights. This study assessed postgraduate students' knowledge and willingness to use Generative AI (GenAI) as a research tool. Methods: This study was quantitative and a cross-sectional survey research design was employed to collect primary data from a sample of 238 selected from an accessible population of 588. The sample members were considered using a convenient sampling method. Data were collected through structured closed-ended questionnaire instruments which were self-designed and piloted. The questionnaires' Cronbach's reliability coefficient was 0. 913: This value reflects a good internal consistency, as well as serves to show the robustness of the instrument to measure the objectives of this study. The study used a period of 3 weeks to collect, clean, and analyze the study data using descriptive statistics and simple linear regression analysis (SPSS 20.0). Results: The study showed that postgraduates have a moderate to high level of knowledge (M 3.189 - 3.706) and willingness to use GenAI (M 2.966 - 3.349). A simple linear regression analysis showed that knowledge level significantly predicted willingness to use Generative AI for research purposes, (r² =. 023, B = 0.12, p = 0.021). Recommendation: Educational institutions should implement targeted training programs on GenAI tools to enhance postgraduate students’ competency and confidence in using these tools for research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Enoch et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 6 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: