Field study reveals opportunistic sleeping site selection in Guinea baboons, indicating that abundant resources override competition and predator avoidance.
Sleeping site selection in animals is thought to be influenced by multiple factors, including resource availability and competition, predation risk, thermoregulation and the risk of parasitic infection. While previous research has highlighted the importance of these factors, little is known about how they affect spatiotemporal patterns of sleeping site use among multiple groups of non‐territorial species with overlapping home ranges. Here, we investigated the sleeping site use of Guinea baboons ( Papio papio ) in Simenti, Senegal. We used locational data for 4 years of several baboon parties sharing the same range. We assessed the distribution of sleeping sites within the local habitat mosaic and patterns of sleeping site use of parties across time. We further investigated the proximity of sleeping sites of parties to those of co‐occurring parties and the impact of food availability and predator presence at the landscape level on the distance between parties' sleeping sites on the same night. In Simenti, Guinea baboons use trees exclusively as sleeping sites, and we found that the vast majority of sleeping sites were in the gallery forest along the perennial Gambia River, likely due to the availability of tall trees. Patterns of sleeping site use of individual parties in general showed no evidence of predator or parasite avoidance. Between parties, Guinea baboons slept in close spatial proximity (< 50 m) to at least one other party, regardless of food availability and predator presence. Thus, Guinea baboons in Simenti likely use the abundantly available sleeping sites opportunistically rather than being driven by intergroup competition or strategies for predator avoidance or reduction of the risk of parasite infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohrndorf et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: