Key result
Rivaroxaban linked to ~7% lower risk of kidney, limb, ophthalmic complications, or death versus warfarin.
Why the study?
Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and type 2 diabetes are at risk of kidney, limb, and ophthalmic complications, prompting evaluation of these outcomes and death with rivaroxaban versus warfarin.
Does rivaroxaban reduce the composite of kidney, limb, ophthalmic complications, and death in adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and type 2 diabetes compared to warfarin?
Cohort (n=83,182)
Does rivaroxaban reduce the composite of kidney, limb, ophthalmic complications, and death in adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and type 2 diabetes compared to warfarin?
In patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and type 2 diabetes, rivaroxaban is associated with a lower risk of kidney, limb, and ophthalmic complications, as well as death, compared to warfarin.
Rivaroxaban was associated with lower composite risk versus warfarin in NVAF with T2D; leaves open whether RCTs should change practice.
BACKGROUND: Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and type 2 diabetes are at risk of kidney, limb, and ophthalmic complications. We evaluated the rate of these complications and death in patients with NVAF and type 2 diabetes prescribed rivaroxaban or warfarin. METHODS: We analyzed Optum de-Identified electronic health record (EHR) data from 11/2010-12/2019. We included adults with NVAF and T2D newly initiated on rivaroxaban or warfarin with ≥12 months of prior EHR activity. Patients with another indication for anticoagulation, valve disease, history of end-stage renal disease, major adverse limb events (MALE), diabetic retinopathy or pregnancy were excluded. We evaluated the incidence rate of developing a composite outcome of >40% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration incidence rate (eGFR) from baseline, eGFR < 15 mL/minute/1.73 m2, need for dialysis or kidney transplant, MALE, diabetic retinopathy or death. Overlap weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics between cohorts while preserving sample size. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using propensity score-overlap weighted Cox regression. RESULTS: We included 24,912 rivaroxaban and 58,270 warfarin users. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) CHA2DS2VASc score was 4.3 ± 1.5 and modified HASBLED score was 1.5 ± 0.8. Thirty percent of rivaroxaban patients were started on 15 mg once daily, with the rest prescribed 20 mg once daily. Warfarin patients had a mean time in therapeutic range of 47 ± 28%. Patients were followed for a mean of 2.89 ± 1.95 years. Rivaroxaban was associated with a reduced hazard of the composite outcome (HR = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.91-0.95; absolute risk reduction = 1.97 events per 1000 patient-years; number needed-to-treat = 51) versus warfarin. Rivaroxaban was also associated with significant reductions in the relative hazard of > 40% decrease in eGFR from baseline (HR = 0.96), need for dialysis or renal transplant (HR = 0.81), and limb revascularization or major amputation (HR = 0.85). Death occurred at a lower incidence rate with rivaroxaban (HR = 0.92, 95%CI = 0.89-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: NCT04509193.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Costa et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and type 2 diabetes (n=83,182). Rivaroxaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Composite outcome of >40% decrease in eGFR from baseline, eGFR < 15 mL/minute/1.73 m2, need for dialysis or kidney transplant, MALE, diabetic retinopathy or death (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.91-0.95). Rivaroxaban was associated with a reduced hazard of the composite of kidney, limb, ophthalmic complications, or death compared to warfarin (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.91-0.95).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: