Key result
Subtherapeutic anticoagulation during initial treatment does not predict CTEPH.
Why the study?
Poor-quality anticoagulation may contribute to CTEPH risk after acute PE, but the association between time in therapeutic range of VKA treatment and CTEPH incidence was unclear.
Does poor-quality initial anticoagulation with vitamin-K antagonists increase the risk of developing CTEPH in patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
Case-Control (n=194)
Yes
Does poor-quality initial anticoagulation with vitamin-K antagonists increase the risk of developing CTEPH in patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
Subtherapeutic initial anticoagulation with vitamin-K antagonists was not more prevalent among acute pulmonary embolism patients who subsequently developed CTEPH compared to those who did not.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Initial subtherapeutic anticoagulation was not associated with CTEPH after PE; leaves open whether anticoagulation quality influences CTEPH risk.
BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is not fully understood. Poor-quality anticoagulation may contribute to a higher risk of CTEPH after acute pulmonary embolism (PE), partly explaining the transition from acute PE to CTEPH. We assessed the association between the time in therapeutic range (TTR) of vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) treatment and incidence of CTEPH after a PE diagnosis. METHODS: Case-control study in which the time spent in, under and above therapeutic range was calculated in 44 PE patients who were subsequently diagnosed with CTEPH (cases). Controls comprised 150 consecutive PE patients in whom echocardiograms two years later did not show pulmonary hypertension. All patients were treated with VKA for at least 6 months after the PE diagnosis. Time in (TTR), under and above range were calculated. Mean differences between cases and controls were estimated by linear regression. RESULTS: Mean TTR during the initial 6-month treatment period was 72% in cases versus 78% in controls (mean difference -6%, 95%CI -12 to -0.1), mainly explained by more time above the therapeutic range in the cases. Mean difference of time under range was 0% (95%CI -6 to 7) and 2% (95CI% -3 to 7) during the first 3 and 6 months, respectively. In a multivariable model, adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for CTEPH were around unity considering different thresholds for 'poor anticoagulation', i.e. TTR <50%, <60% and <70%. CONCLUSION: Subtherapeutic initial anticoagulation was not more prevalent among PE patients diagnosed with CTEPH than in those who did not develop CTEPH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boon et al. (2020) conducted a case-control in Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) (n=194). Vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) vs. Controls without CTEPH was evaluated on Mean time in therapeutic range (TTR) during the initial 6-month treatment period (Mean difference -6%, 95% CI -12 to -0.1). Mean time in therapeutic range during the initial 6-month treatment was 72% in CTEPH cases versus 78% in controls (mean difference -6%), indicating that subtherapeutic anticoagulation does not predict CTEPH.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: