⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

January 1, 1991The University of Chicago Law Review

The Plaintiffs' Attorney's Role in Class Action and Derivative Litigation: Economic Analysis and Recommendations for Reform

Jonathan R. Macey Geoffrey P. Miller

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

Jonathan R. Macey, Geoffrey P. Miller, The Plaintiffs' Attorney's Role in Class Action and Derivative Litigation: Economic Analysis and Recommendations for Reform, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 58, No. 1 (Winter, 1991), pp. 1-118

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Macey et al. (1991) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a166788497e763bc37c05db https://doi.org/10.2307/1599901

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context:

1Following the Script: Narratives of Suspicion in Terry Stops in Street PolicingThe University of Chicago Law Review · Wed,
2The Most Popular Tool: Tax Increment Financing and the Political Economy of Local GovernmentThe University of Chicago Law Review · Fri,
3The Origins of the American Public Trust Doctrine: What Really Happened in Illinois CentralThe University of Chicago Law Review · Thu,
4The Changing Purposes of Criminal Punishment: A Retrospective on the past Century and Some Thoughts about the NextThe University of Chicago Law Review · Wed,
5Christopher St. German and the Law of CustomThe University of Chicago Law Review · Wed,

More from The University of Chicago Law Review

Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an OxymoronWed,
The Philosophical Dimensions of the Doctrine of UnconscionabilityWed,
The Origins of Judicial ReviewWed,
Cultivating Humanity in Legal EducationWed,
Indefinitely Renewable CopyrightWed,