An AngioIMR > 40 was significantly associated with a higher risk of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization in STEMI patients (HR 4.282; 95% CI 2.325-7.886; p<0.0001).
Cohort (n=178)
Does significant coronary microvascular dysfunction (AngioIMR > 40) predict all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
178 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent invasive coronary angiography and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), mean age 65.0 ± 12.8 years, 74% male.
Presence of significant coronary microvascular dysfunction defined as AngioIMR > 40, calculated using computational flow and pressure simulation immediately after PPCI.
Patients with AngioIMR ≤ 40 (no significant coronary microvascular dysfunction).
Composite of all cause death or hospitalization for heart failure (MACE) at median follow-up of 2.9 years.composite
Elevated AngioIMR (>40) measured immediately after primary PCI is a strong independent predictor of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization in STEMI patients.
Effect estimate: HR 4.282 (95% CI 2.325-7.886)
Absolute Event Rate: 70% vs 27%
p-value: p=< 0.0001
Background: Several methods for measuring IMR derived from angiography have been developed. AngioIMR is a novel method for the assessment of angiography-derived IMR with no requirement for a wire and hyperemia. The prognostic value of AngioIMR is unknown in STEMI patients. We aimed to provide the prognostic value of AngioIMR in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: This study included patients with STEMI who underwent invasive coronary angiography and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). AngioIMR was calculated using computational flow and pressure simulation immediately after PPCI. The presence of significant coronary microvascular dysfunction was defined as AngioIMR > 40. The primary outcome was a composite of all cause death or hospitalization for heart failure (MACE). Results: A total of 178 patients were included (65.0 ± 12.8 years on average, 74 % male gender). An AngioIMR > 40 was found in 72 patients. During a median follow-up of 2.9 (2.3-6.9) years, a primary endpoint was observed in 56 patients. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the risk of MACE was significantly higher in patients with AngioIMR > 40 (log-rank P 40 was significantly associated with the occurrence of the primary endpoint in univariate (70 % vs 27 %; hazard ratio 4.519; 95 % CI: 2.550-8.009; p < 0.0001) and multivariate analysis (Hazard ratio 4.282; 95 % CI: 2.325-7.886; p < 0.0001). AngioIMR model showed incremental prognostic value compared to a model with clinical and imaging risk predictors (C-index 0.84 vs 0.79; p = 0.04). Conlusion: Elevated AngioIMR showed a independent prognostic significance in STEMI patients. In addition to well-known risk factors, assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction can be a feasible approach for early prevention and a therapeutic target in STEMI patients.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Benoit Caullery
Laurent Riou
Stéphanie Marlière
IJC Heart & Vasculature
Inserm
Université Grenoble Alpes
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Caullery et al. (Thu,) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=178). AngioIMR > 40 vs. AngioIMR ≤ 40 was evaluated on Composite of all cause death or hospitalization for heart failure (MACE) (HR 4.282, 95% CI 2.325-7.886, p=< 0.0001). An AngioIMR > 40 was significantly associated with a higher risk of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization in STEMI patients (HR 4.282; 95% CI 2.325-7.886; p<0.0001).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a166e12994c1ef0e34c5bb5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101575