Landslide dams typically comprise unconsolidated and poorly sorted material and are vulnerable to rapid failure and breaching, resulting in significant and sudden flood risk downstream. Hence they constitute a serious natural hazard, and rapid assessment of the likely peak flow rate is required to enable preparation of adequate mitigation strategies. To determine the relative utility and accuracy of dambreak flood forecasts, field estimates of peak outflow rates from the failure of the Poerua landslide dam in October 1999 were compared with estimates from physical laboratory modeling, empirical methods, and computer modeling. There was reasonable agreement among the field estimates, laboratory modeling, and computer modeling. Some empirical estimates were less reliable. Reasonably reliable estimates of peak outflow can be obtained from computer model routines sufficiently rapidly to be of use in an emergency management situation. The laboratory modeling demonstrated the effect of dam batter slopes and valley bed slope on peak outflow; this information could be used to refine empirical or numerical estimates of peak outflow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davies et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: