Key result
Novel Selcuk score outperforms THRIVE in predicting acute ischemic stroke hospital mortality with ~0.88 AUC.
Why the study?
Stroke incidence is increasing worldwide, creating a need for new, simple, and useful prognostic scales with higher predictive value to predict stroke prognosis.
Does the Selcuk score improve the prediction of hospital mortality in patients with acute ischemic stroke compared to existing prognostic scales?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,697)
No
Does the Selcuk score improve the prediction of hospital mortality in patients with acute ischemic stroke compared to existing prognostic scales?
The novel Selcuk scoring system demonstrates superior predictive power for hospital mortality in acute ischemic stroke patients compared to existing scales like THRIVE.
May support mortality risk stratification in acute ischemic stroke; leaves open external validation before clinical use.
Introduction: The incidence of stroke is increasing worldwide; thus, prognostic scales with higher predictive values are becoming more important. We aimed to develop a new, simple and useful prognostic scale with high predictive power to predict stroke prognosis. Materials and Method: The blood samples, imaging data, and clinical parameters of 1697 stroke patients were analyzed retrospectively to evaluate hospital mortality. Binary logistic regression analysis was applied, and appropriate parameters were determined. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used for the calibration, and internal validation was applied to the model. Comparisons were performed using the Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events score and Ling et al. scores (2019), which were evaluated. Results: Level of consciousness, length of hospital stay, albumin level, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, lesion volume, periventricular hypodensity, and age were the most significant preevaluation parameters. The sensitivity and specificity of the model in predicting mortality were 83.6% (78.4–88%) and 81.2% (79.1–83.2%), respectively. The area under the curve for our developed model was 0.884 (0.868–0.899) (p<0.001). This value was higher than the Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events score of 0.822 (0.803–0.840) and Ling et al. score (2019) of 0.864 (0.847–0.880) in the literature. Conclusions: The novel Selcuk scoring system, has a better predictive power than other well-known scales used to evaluate mortality. Although the system was proven to be accurate by internal validation, it should be tested in different environments. After further clinical validation studies, our model is anticipated to be useful and promising in clinical daily practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özgüncü et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute ischemic stroke (n=1,697). Selcuk score vs. THRIVE score was evaluated on Hospital mortality prediction (AUC) (95% CI 0.868-0.899, p=<0.001). The novel Selcuk scoring system predicted hospital mortality in acute ischemic stroke patients with an area under the curve of 0.884, significantly outperforming the THRIVE score.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: