We study the abundance of satellite galaxies around 198 Milky Way- (MW) and M31-like hosts in TNG50, the final installment in the IllustrisTNG suite of cosmological magnetohydrodynamical simulations. MW/M31-like analogues are defined as discy galaxies with stellar masses of M_* = 1010.5 - 11.2~M_ in relative isolation at z = 0. By defining satellites as galaxies with M_* ≥ 5× 10⁶~M_ within 300~kpc (3D) of their host, we find a remarkable level of diversity and host-to-host scatter across individual host galaxies. The median TNG50 MW/M31-like galaxy hosts a total of 5⁺⁶₋₃ satellites with M_* ≥ 8 × 10⁶~M_, reaching up to M_* ~ 10^8.5+0.9-1.1~M_. Even at a fixed host halo mass of 10¹²~M_, the total number of satellites ranges between 0 and 11. The abundance of subhaloes with Mdyn ≥ 5 × 10⁷~M_ is larger by a factor of more than 10. The number of all satellites (subhaloes) ever accreted is larger by a factor of 4–5 (3–5) than those surviving to z = 0. Hosts with larger galaxy stellar mass, brighter K-band luminosity, more recent halo assembly, and – most significantly – larger total halo mass typically have a larger number of surviving satellites. The satellite abundances around TNG50 MW/M31-like galaxies are consistent with those of mass-matched hosts from observational surveys (e.g. SAGA) and previous simulations (e.g. Latte). While the observed MW satellite system falls within the TNG50 scatter across all stellar masses considered, M31 is slightly more satellite-rich than our 1σ scatter but well consistent with the high-mass end of the TNG50 sample. We find a handful of systems with both a Large and a Small Magellanic Cloud-like satellite. There is no missing satellites problem according to TNG50.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Engler et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: