Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved confidence intervals for risk differences in paired correlated data, suggesting advantages in small-sample settings.
In clinical studies involving paired organs (e.g. eyes or ears), correlated binary outcomes necessitate specialized statistical methods to account for intra-subject dependencies. This paper proposes a saddlepoint approximation (SA) method for constructing confidence intervals (CI) for risk differences in paired binary data under Donner's correlation model. Compared to conventional approaches - Wald, likelihood ratio, score, and MOVER methods - the SA method explicitly incorporates higher-order moment information, offering improved accuracy in small-sample or rare-event settings. Simulation studies evaluate empirical coverage probability (ECP) and mean interval width (MIW) across varying correlation levels. Results demonstrate that SA consistently maintains ECPs near the nominal 95% level while achieving narrower intervals than competing methods, particularly under high correlation. In contrast, likelihood and score tests exhibit undercoverage, and Wald/MOVER intervals are overly conservative. An application to otitis media trial data further validates SA's utility, yielding interpretable inferences for correlated bilateral outcomes. The proposed method bridges a critical gap in small-sample inference for risk differences, ensuring robustness without reliance on large-sample approximations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: