Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates restoring force models in coupling beams, indicating their accuracy for design purposes.
Coupling beams are critical connecting components in coupled shear wall systems and core tube structures. At the same time, they play an important role when the structure is subjected to an earthquake. Plate-reinforced composite (PRC) coupling beams exhibit superior comprehensive performance in terms of bearing capacity, deformation performance, energy dissipation capacity, and construction efficiency. However, research on PRC coupling beams remains limited both domestically and internationally. To better describe the structural response of steel plate–concrete composite coupling beams, this study collected existing experimental data. The beams had a small span-to-depth ratio. The loading was cyclic. The study normalized the skeleton curves of each specimen. The span-to-depth ratio ranged from 0.9 to 2.5. The plate ratio ranged from 3% to 5%. For these beams, preliminary skeleton curve fitting equations are proposed. The equations are based on existing data. The equations apply to two types of composite coupling beams. One type uses a steel plate and ordinary concrete. The other type uses a steel plate and fiber concrete. These equations are derived using a trilinear model and linear fitting tools. Furthermore, restoring force models for steel plate–conventional concrete and steel plate–fiber concrete composite coupling beams with a small span-to-depth ratio are proposed. Comparative analysis shows that each model captures the hysteretic response of PRC coupling beams with acceptable accuracy in the elastic and decline phases, while the elastic–plastic stage is suitable only for trend prediction. It should be noted that the proposed models are preliminary engineering approximations primarily applicable within the following ranges: a span-to-depth ratio of 0.9~2.5, a plate ratio of 3~5%, concrete strength of C30~C50, a longitudinal reinforcement ratio of 0.86~2.23%, a stirrup ratio of 0.56~0.63%, and a steel plate thickness of 6~10 mm. For configurations significantly outside these ranges, additional experimental validation is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: