Evaluates yield performance of native and commercial Capsicum annuum under hydroponic and open-field systems, indicating distinct growth responses.
The performance of native landraces of Capsicum annuum L. under contrasting production systems remains poorly understood, limiting their evaluation under locally relevant production scenarios. This study evaluated the phenological and productive responses of five genotypes (four native landraces and one commercial cultivar) under two systems representing locally relevant production conditions: open-field (OF) and a substrate-based hydroponic system under low-technology, passively ventilated tunnel-type greenhouse conditions (GH), to describe genotype-specific responses under contrasting production conditions during the 2023 growing season in Puebla, Mexico. Agroclimatic and agronomic variables were analyzed using independent ANOVA by system and canonical correlation analysis (CCA). The GH system exhibited restrictive microclimatic conditions, with maximum temperatures exceeding 48 °C and photosynthetically active radiation reduced by approximately 53% compared to OF conditions. Environmental conditions were not standardized between systems; therefore, the results reflect the contrasting microclimates of locally relevant production systems and provide a context-specific assessment of genotype performance. Under the specific conditions evaluated, yield was lower in GH compared to OF across all genotypes. The commercial cultivar Serrano Tampico achieved the highest yield (1.118 kg per plant under OF), while Mixteco Largo and Cola de Ratón produced the highest number of fruits. The CCA identified genotype-specific associations between environmental and agronomic variables, suggesting distinct performance patterns under contrasting production conditions, with native landraces exhibiting better agronomic performance under OF conditions. Overall, the results provide a context-specific characterization of genotype performance under contrasting production conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hernández-Hernández et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: