Demonstrates improved accuracy in X-ray weld defect detection, highlighting efficiency for industrial inspection.
To address the detection challenges in X-ray weld seam images caused by weak contrast, slender structures, and multi-scale coexistence, we propose MGDR-YOLO, an industrially deployable detector with four coordinated designs. First, a MultiBackbone parallel heterogeneous backbone is designed to perform complementary direction–detail modeling and lightweight context modeling under a shared shallow stem, enhancing the joint representation of fine-grained features and global semantics. Second, Gated Attention Fusion Block (GAFB) is introduced to perform selective in-scale fusion via channel gating and local–global attention mechanisms, thereby suppressing channel redundancy and noise leakage induced by naive concatenation. Third, Directional Feature Convolution (DFConv) decouples standard 2D convolution into horizontal and vertical branches and fuses them using depthwise separable convolution, substantially reducing computational cost while preserving geometric alignment. Finally, Rep Shared Convolutional Detection Head (RSCD) improves detection head consistency and inference throughput through cross-scale shared convolutions and a training-to-deployment re-parameterization scheme. The experimental results show that MGDR-YOLO significantly outperforms YOLOv11n, increasing the mean average precision (mAP) from 92.9% to 95.2%. The performance gain is most pronounced for the LP class (slender and low-contrast defects), with an mAP improvement of 10.1 percentage points. Meanwhile, the proposed model achieves a 39.4% increase in frames per second (FPS) while reducing the number of parameters by 46.2%, demonstrating superior efficiency. These results indicate that MGDR-YOLO consistently improves the accuracy and robustness of X-ray weld defect detection while maintaining real-time performance, making it well suited for resource-constrained industrial online inspection scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: