Observational study compares modified single-screw and traditional two-screw scarf osteotomies, indicating effectiveness remains consistent.
Background/Objectives: A short scarf osteotomy involves the conventional “Z”-shaped osteotomy which is shorter in length with promising results. Fixation can be performed with a single screw or two screws. This observational study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of single-screw versus traditional two-screw scarf osteotomies for the correction of hallux valgus deformities. Methods: Forty-eight hallux valgus cases treated between 2019 and 2024 were reviewed. Data collected included patient demographics, operative details, radiological outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs were assessed using the Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ) and the visual analogue scale (VAS). A cost analysis was also performed. Results: Fourteen patients (29.2%) underwent traditional two-screw scarf osteotomies. In this group, the hallux valgus angle (HVA) improved from 37.4° to 19.6° (p < 0.001), and the intermetatarsal angle (IMA) improved from 16.5° to 8.9° (p = 0.004). MOxFQ scores decreased from 37.8 to 27.4 (p = 0.139), and VAS scores improved from 7.4 to 3.3 (p = 0.012). Complications were limited to two superficial infections (14.3%). The remaining 34 patients (70.8%) underwent modified single-screw scarf osteotomies. This group demonstrated an HVA improvement from 34.7° to 12.6° (p < 0.001) and an IMA improvement from 15.5° to 7.8° (p < 0.001). MOxFQ scores improved from 39.4 to 10.4 (p < 0.001), and VAS scores decreased from 6.6 to 2.5 (p = 0.002). Complications included three superficial infections (8.8%), two intraoperative fractures (5.9%), and two cases of complex regional pain syndrome (5.9%). Conclusions: The modified single-screw scarf osteotomy appears clinically non-inferior to the traditional two-screw technique. Although wider validation is required, these findings suggest that the single-screw technique may offer an alternative that maintains clinical outcomes while supporting more sustainable healthcare resource use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zace et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: