PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 2026Osteology0 citationsOpen Access

The Clinical Effectiveness of the Modified Single-Screw Scarf Osteotomy in Comparison to the Traditional Two-Screw Osteotomy: An Observational Study

View Full Paper
PZPamela ZaceCMC. O. MathewsTSTurab Syed

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of modified single-screw and traditional two-screw scarf osteotomies for hallux valgus correction.
  • Review of 48 hallux valgus cases treated from 2019 to 2024.
  • Data collected included patient demographics, radiological outcomes, and PROMs using MOxFQ and VAS.
  • Performed cost analysis comparing both surgical techniques.
  • Single-screw scarf osteotomy improved HVA from 34.7° to 12.6° (p < 0.001) and IMA from 15.5° to 7.8° (p < 0.001).
  • Traditional two-screw technique improved HVA from 37.4° to 19.6° (p < 0.001) and IMA from 16.5° to 8.9° (p = 0.004).
  • MOxFQ and VAS scores significantly improved in both groups, with single-screw showing greater PROMs improvement (MOxFQ, p < 0.001; VAS, p = 0.002).

Abstract

Background/Objectives: A short scarf osteotomy involves the conventional “Z”-shaped osteotomy which is shorter in length with promising results. Fixation can be performed with a single screw or two screws. This observational study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of single-screw versus traditional two-screw scarf osteotomies for the correction of hallux valgus deformities. Methods: Forty-eight hallux valgus cases treated between 2019 and 2024 were reviewed. Data collected included patient demographics, operative details, radiological outcomes, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs were assessed using the Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ) and the visual analogue scale (VAS). A cost analysis was also performed. Results: Fourteen patients (29.2%) underwent traditional two-screw scarf osteotomies. In this group, the hallux valgus angle (HVA) improved from 37.4° to 19.6° (p < 0.001), and the intermetatarsal angle (IMA) improved from 16.5° to 8.9° (p = 0.004). MOxFQ scores decreased from 37.8 to 27.4 (p = 0.139), and VAS scores improved from 7.4 to 3.3 (p = 0.012). Complications were limited to two superficial infections (14.3%). The remaining 34 patients (70.8%) underwent modified single-screw scarf osteotomies. This group demonstrated an HVA improvement from 34.7° to 12.6° (p < 0.001) and an IMA improvement from 15.5° to 7.8° (p < 0.001). MOxFQ scores improved from 39.4 to 10.4 (p < 0.001), and VAS scores decreased from 6.6 to 2.5 (p = 0.002). Complications included three superficial infections (8.8%), two intraoperative fractures (5.9%), and two cases of complex regional pain syndrome (5.9%). Conclusions: The modified single-screw scarf osteotomy appears clinically non-inferior to the traditional two-screw technique. Although wider validation is required, these findings suggest that the single-screw technique may offer an alternative that maintains clinical outcomes while supporting more sustainable healthcare resource use.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zace et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a168a090c924ddd1bd58b2dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/osteology6020008
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper