Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores energy harvesting efficiency in oscillating foils, indicating key design parameters matter.
In this study, the energy harvesting mechanism of a two-degree-of-freedom (2-DOF) oscillating foil under near-surface conditions and the underlying influence of structural parameters are systematically investigated. Numerical simulations are conducted using the open-source CFD platform OpenFOAM and the waves2Foam toolbox. The free surface is captured using the volume of fluid (VOF) method, while the heave and pitch motions of the foil are simulated via the overWaveDyMFoam solver, coupling 6-DOF dynamic equations with the overset grid technique. The results demonstrate that the periodic evolution and shedding of the leading-edge vortex (LEV) fundamentally drive the self-sustained oscillation of the foil. Moreover, the phase synchronization between the fluid-induced force and the kinematic response serves as the core mechanism for efficient energy extraction. Structural parameters critically regulate these characteristics: stiffness coefficients dictate the natural frequency and phase coordination, thereby modulating the overall motion response. Notably, a local resonance occurs when the system’s natural frequency approaches the fluid’s vortex shedding frequency, inducing the maximum kinematic response. Within the investigated parameter space, the system achieves a peak energy harvesting efficiency of 45.6% and a maximum average power coefficient of 1.15. Finally, the damping coefficients are found to primarily govern the response amplitude and the viscous dissipation of the system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: