Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Real-world data reveal survival outcomes in MET-altered NSCLC patients, suggesting subtype-based management implications.
Background MET is a key driver in NSCLC yet comprehensive, multi-subtype real-world data in China are lacking. Methods: Real-world data were collected from MET-altered NSCLC patients diagnosed at a comprehensive hospital in southeastern China (July 2021–December 2023). Four subgroups were analyzed: MET IHC-Positive, MET Amplification, MET Exon 14 skipping, and MET Other Mutations. Demographics, risk factors, comorbidities, pathology, co-mutation, and treatment patterns were compared. With 2-year follow-up, survival outcomes and MET-TKI benefit were analyzed. Results Among 574 patients: MET IHC-Pos (81.4%), MET-Amp (11.0%), MET-Ex14 (4.70%), and Others (2.96%). Patients were predominantly elderly, male, with > 40% smoking history and > 35% hypertension. Pathological specimens were mainly obtained via bronchoscopy or percutaneous lung puncture. Adenocarcinoma dominated all subtypes (> 70%), increasing with IHC intensity in MET IHC-Pos ( p < 0.05). MET-Amp showed the highest advanced stage (87.3%), bone (36.5%) and brain metastasis (17.5%). TP53 was the most common co-mutation (20.7%–25.0%). Targeted therapy predominated (Line 1st: 54.6%, Line 2nd: 38.9%), followed by chemotherapy plus immunotherapy. The 24-month OS was lower in MET-Amp (44.4%) and MET-Ex14 (48.1%) than in MET IHC-Pos (57.2%) and Others (58.8%). The 24-month OS (MET-TKI treated vs. untreated) was: 69.2% vs. 38.5% (MET IHC-Pos 2 + /3 +), 71.4% vs. 25.0% (MET-Ex14), and 47.4% vs. 42.9% (MET-Amp). Conclusions MET alterations occur predominantly in the elderly, males, and smokers. MET-Ex14 shows driver-dependent characteristics with clear MET-TKI benefit. MET-Amp presents the most aggressive phenotype. MET IHC-Pos predominates (> 80%) with heterogeneity; the 2 + /3 + may benefit from MET-TKI. These findings inform subtype-based management of MET-altered NSCLC in southeastern China.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: