Randomized trial examines negative meta-stereotype impact on doctor-patient relationships, highlighting emotional care's role.
This study aims to explore the relationship between negative meta-stereotypes, intergroup anxiety, doctor–patient trust, and doctor–patient relationships and investigate the intervention impact of imagined intergroup contact through two experiments. Study 1 examined whether intergroup anxiety and doctor–patient trust sequentially mediate the effect of negative meta-stereotypes on the doctor–patient relationship. Two hundred participants were randomly assigned to a negative meta-stereotype activation or control group, and completed measures of intergroup anxiety, doctor–patient trust, and doctor–patient relationship quality. Study 2 built on these findings by testing imagined intergroup contact as a potential intervention. Following negative meta-stereotype activation, 184 participants were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: no imagination, imagined landscape, imagined contact with a professionalism-focused physician, or imagined contact with a care-focused physician. Study 1 revealed that negative meta-stereotype activation significantly increased intergroup anxiety, decreased doctor–patient trust, and impaired the doctor–patient relationship. Importantly, intergroup anxiety and doctor–patient trust played a chain mediating role in this relationship. Study 2 demonstrated that only imagined contact with a caring physician (but not a purely professional one) significantly reduced intergroup anxiety, enhanced doctor–patient trust, and improved the doctor–patient relationship. These findings provide evidence consistent with a serial emotional-cognitive pathway from intergroup anxiety to doctor–patient trust through which negative meta-stereotypes may impair the doctor–patient relationship, and by pinpointing emotional care as the core component that makes imagined intergroup contact effective in this context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yanli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: