Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative review of fabrication strategies highlights efficiency and performance in water treatment applications.
Electrospun ZnO nanofiber membranes are promising candidates for photocatalytic water treatment, offering directional charge transport, high surface-to-volume ratio, and self-standing membrane architectures that enable straightforward catalyst retrieval and reuse, a critical advantage over dispersed semiconductor nanoparticle systems where post-treatment recovery remains a major bottleneck. However, the fabrication route fundamentally determines membrane morphology, mechanical integrity, retrievability, and photocatalytic performance. This review classifies electrospinning-based fabrication into three routes: the Ceramic Membrane Route (precursor/polymer blending followed by calcination), the Hierarchical Membrane Route (secondary ZnO growth on electrospun polymer scaffolds), and the Composite Membrane Route (direct electrospinning of pre-synthesized ZnO/polymer dispersions). The Ceramic Membrane Route yields high-crystallinity membranes with up to 100% pollutant degradation but poor mechanical integrity that hinders membrane retrieval. The Composite Membrane Route provides single-step fabrication with the best demonstrated reusability (10 cycles at 97–99% retention), 200-fold lower zinc leaching, and excellent mechanical robustness for repeated retrieval and deployment, positioning it as one of the more operationally mature options for near-term deployment. The Hierarchical Membrane Route delivers the highest surface area, the fastest degradation kinetics, and uniquely combines photocatalysis with membrane filtration in a single device, making it a particularly promising long-term direction once its multi-step processing is streamlined and continuous-flow scale-up is realized. This comparative framework guides the selection of fabrication strategy based on membrane retrievability, performance, and development-stage requirements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rianjanu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: