PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 2026Journal of Marine Science and Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Numerical Study of KVLCC2 Self-Propulsion with Conventional and Ducted Propellers in Shallow Water

View Full Paper
BCBoao CaiQYQingchao YangJLJingjun Lou

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the hydrodynamic performance of the KVLCC2 tanker using different propeller configurations in shallow water.
  • Conducted computational fluid dynamics simulations using STAR-CCM+.
  • Utilized RANS equations with SST k-ω turbulence model for performance analysis.
  • Validated results against experimental data with errors below 5%.
  • Ducted propeller improved open-water efficiency but caused higher thrust deduction and lower wake fractions.
  • At H/T = 1.5 in shallow water, a 20.8% power reduction was achieved using the ducted configuration.
  • Ducted configuration enhanced hull efficiency, mitigating shallow-water losses and improving propulsive efficiency.

Abstract

This study investigates the hydrodynamic performance of the KVLCC2 tanker in deep and shallow water using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, focusing on resistance and self-propulsion with both ducted and non-ducted propellers. The Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations, coupled with the SST k-ω turbulence model, are solved using STAR-CCM+ to analyze ship resistance, open-water propeller characteristics, and self-propulsion factors. Validation against experimental data confirms the numerical accuracy, with uncertainties below acceptable thresholds. In deep water, the body force propeller and body force ducted propeller methods are validated against the discretized propeller approach, yielding errors under 5%. The ducted propeller enhances open-water efficiency but results in higher thrust deduction and lower wake fractions, leading to reduced hull and overall propulsive efficiencies compared to the non-ducted case. In shallow water, as the depth-to-draft ratio (H/T) decreases to 1.5, added resistance, sinkage, and trim increase sharply due to blockage effects. The ducted configuration mitigates these penalties, achieving a 20.8% power reduction at H/T = 1.5. Added self-propulsion factors reveal that the duct improves hull efficiency and offsets shallow-water losses, enhancing propulsive efficiency. Flow field analysis shows accelerated stern wakes and asymmetric structures in shallow water, with the body force methods providing consistent predictions despite minor discrepancies in extreme conditions. This research highlights the efficacy of ducted propellers in shallow water and the reliability of body force methods for efficient simulations, offering insights for ship design in restricted depths.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cai et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a168a4b0c924ddd1bd58feahttps://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14100905
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper