Analyzes thermal response and wear mechanisms in modern leather belts, suggesting effective evaluation methods.
Flat leather belts were the first to be used in drive and transport technology and were later replaced by plastic belts. Recently, there has been a return to hybrid designs, where belts are constructed as a “sandwich” with a technical leather outer layer and a polyamide or TPU inner core. This study analyses the thermal behavior of a modern leather belt transmission as a function of braking torque at different rotational speeds of the active pulley. A linear temperature response was observed, with temperature differences between the passive and active belts of 4 °C at 500 rpm (R2 = 0.93), 5.4 °C at 1000 rpm (R2 = 0.96), and 4 °C at 1500 rpm (R2 = 0.98). Due to the specific structure of the outer layer, non-contact surface measurement methods were applied. Surface topography analysis showed only minor changes in average roughness, with Sq = 37.8 µm (new belt) and 37.9 µm (used belt) and Sa decreasing from 26.5 µm to 25.1 µm. However, clear morphological changes were observed: Ssk decreased from 2.63 to 2.00, Sku from 14.3 to 8.19, Sp from 449 µm to 308 µm, and Sz from 557 µm to 400 µm, indicating reduced peak sharpness after wear. Profile parameters increased after operation, with Ra rising from 18.6 µm to 21.9 µm, Rq from 26.7 µm to 30.7 µm, and Rz from 116 µm to 143 µm. Microscopy confirmed wear-related smoothing and fragmentation of surface asperities. The results demonstrate that the applied methods are effective for evaluating thermal response and wear mechanisms in modern leather composite belts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krawiec et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: