Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores energy extraction in floating oscillating water column systems, suggesting enhanced efficiency through modified functionalities.
This study presents a comprehensive numerical investigation of a modified backward bent duct buoy (BBDB) floating oscillating water column (FOWC) system, with emphasis on coupled hydrodynamic response and power take-off (PTO) representation. A fully integrated computational framework is developed using SIEMENS STAR-CCM+, ANSYS AQUA and ANSYS CFX, and three-dimensional CFD, incorporating free-surface wave modeling (VOF), six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) body motion, and mooring system interaction under realistic offshore wave conditions (Hs = 3.0 m, T = 9.0 s). A key contribution of this work is the development of an orifice-based PTO surrogate calibrated to replicate turbine-equivalent pressure-drop behavior. Comparative analysis demonstrates that the selected 0.30D orifice reproduces turbine response with deviations below 10% in pressure and flow characteristics, while maintaining superior numerical stability. Hydrodynamic analysis confirms that the modified BBDB-FOWC exhibits stable and bounded motion, with dominant heave-driven response and controlled pitch behavior. The influence of viscous damping is quantified through free-decay analysis and incorporated into the coupled simulations. Results show that damping enhances pressure development by ~25% and flow throughput by ~20%, leading to a significant increase in energy extraction potential. Dimensionless analysis further reveals that the system operates in a turbulent, inertia-dominated regime, governed by nonlinear oscillatory flow dynamics. The combined results demonstrate that the proposed methodology enables accurate, stable, and computationally efficient modeling of floating OWC systems with realistic PTO behavior. The findings provide a scalable framework for future optimization and support the development of high-performance offshore wave energy converters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weerakoon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: