Systematic review reveals intercostal nerve cryoablation reduces inpatient opioid use in adults undergoing thoracic and cardiac surgery, suggesting its clinical benefit.
Objectives Thoracic and cardiac surgical procedures are associated with significant postoperative pain. Intercostal nerve cryoablation (INC) is a non-opioid adjunctive pain management strategy. The objective of this study was to comprehensively review published outcomes of INC during non-pectus repair thoracic and cardiac surgeries to inform clinical practice and guideline development. Methods A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and using manual approaches to identify comparative studies of patients undergoing non-pectus repair thoracic or cardiac procedures with INC versus standard of care (SOC) without INC. Meta-analyses were performed to quantitively evaluate opioid consumption and hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were summarized qualitatively. Results Twenty-four studies were included encompassing 18,465 patients, of whom 10.6% (n = 1,954) received INC. INC was applied during surgical stabilization of rib fractures, thoracotomy, pulmonary resections, lung transplants, aortic aneurysm repair, and cardiac procedures. Meta-analyses of adult studies demonstrated a significant reduction in inpatient opioid consumption by 102 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) (95% confidence interval [CI]: -180.00, -23.87) and a non-significant reduction in opioid consumption after discharge by 89 MME (95% CI: -182.00, 4.56) with INC. Sub-group analysis demonstrated the largest effect size in inpatient opioid reduction for bilateral thoracotomy or thoracosternotomy for lung transplants. Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in hospital stay for adult patients treated with INC. Conclusion The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis provide evidence to support the association between INC and reduced inpatient opioid consumption in non-pectus repair thoracic and cardiac procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Towe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: