Identifies risk hotspot migration in freeway merging areas, suggesting improved safety for mixed traffic flow.
The transition to mixed traffic flows comprising Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs) and Human-Driven Vehicles (HVs) induces a fundamental spatial reconfiguration of risk in freeway merging areas. This study proposes a novel spatiotemporal safety assessment framework to characterize the dynamic evolution of risk hotspots. Unlike traditional models, the framework integrates a conflict prediction model based on Negative Binomial regression with a high-resolution, grid-based risk mapping technique. By applying this framework to data from a microscopically simulated and carefully calibrated environment, we successfully identify a distinct migration pattern of risk hotspots: as CAV penetration increases, high-risk zones shift from the static geometric bottleneck at the ramp merge point to a dynamic interaction interface on the mainline. This paradigm shift is further quantified using a multi-dimensional indicator system. A case study demonstrates that increasing the CAV penetration rate from 10% to 50% can improve the safety grade of a merging area from D (Poor) to A (Excellent). The proposed framework provides a practical tool for refined safety diagnostics and offers insights for spatiotemporal risk analysis, informing the development of future cooperative control strategies in mixed traffic environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: