Experimental study investigates bond performance of negative Poisson’s ratio bars with concrete, highlighting their tensile properties and failure modes.
Negative Poisson’s ratio (NPR) bars, as novel materials, exhibit a significant volumetric dilation effect under tension. Compared to conventional reinforcement, NPR bars offer distinct advantages, including high ductility, high strength, and superior corrosion resistance. This study investigates the tensile properties of three types of NPR bars: the bare round bar, spiral ribbed bar, and steel strand. Their bond behavior with concrete was examined through central pull-out tests, considering the influences of bar type, NPR bar diameter, and anchorage length. The analysis focuses on the tensile mechanical properties, characteristics of the bond–slip curves, failure modes, and the development of predictive models for key bond–slip parameters. The results indicate that all three NPR types possess a high elastic modulus and exceptional ductility. The bare round bar achieved an elongation at break of 51.2%, with only minor necking observed at the fracture surface. The bond failure mode is influenced by bar type, NPR bar diameter, and anchorage length: pull-out failure occurred for the bare round bar, spiral ribbed bar with short anchorage length, and small-diameter steel strand, whereas splitting failure was observed for the spiral ribbed bar with long anchorage length. The large-diameter strand exhibited a combined splitting–pull-out failure. Furthermore, the bond–slip curves for the bare round bar and steel strand displayed two distinct peak strengths. The bond strength of the bare round bar increased with longer anchorage length, while it decreased for both the spiral ribbed bar and steel strand. Empirical models developed based on experimental data demonstrate good predictive accuracy for the bond performance of the different bar types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: