Analytical model tracks civilizational sovereignty erosion and long-term risks, suggesting a gradual shift in predictability.
This paper introduces the “Civilizational Sovereignty Clock” — a twelve-phase analytical framework tracking the progressive erosion of civilizational sovereignty through increasing informational observability, algorithmic reconstructibility, and computational transparency. Each phase details the internal transformation of civilization’s information-processing architecture, from pre-informational fragmentation to full synthetic reconstructability. The model frames long-term existential risk not as sudden catastrophe but as a continuous gradient process in which internal uncertainty is replaced by computable predictability through civilization’s own technological and competitive dynamics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A. Krasovski (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: