Randomized trial compares different training methods on futsal performance and neuromuscular adaptation in male students, suggesting effective strategies for training.
Efforts to identify the most effective educational methods, i.e. linear (LP), non-linear (NLP), and differential (DL) for motor learning has increased. This study was designed as a randomized controlled trial to compare LP, NLP, and DL on neuromuscular adaptation and futsal shooting performance. For the selection of this study, 52 male university students (age = 25.87 ± 2.63) who play futsal recreationally were randomly assigned to one of three training groups; LP (n = 19), NLP (n = 15) and DL (n = 18). Each group participated in 24 training sessions (two 90-minute sessions per week over the course of 12 weeks). Neuromuscular adaptation was evaluated by TMS method and futsal shot (pre-test, post-test, and retention) with a valid test. The results revealed that in futsal shooting performance, the NLP group demonstrated a large and statistically significant advantage over the DL group immediately following training (post-test: p < 0.001). However, this advantage was not maintained, as there was no significant difference between NLP and DL (NLP > DL) at the retention test (p = 0.998). The NLP and DL groups both significantly outperformed the LP group at all time points. For the MEP variable, the post-hoc comparisons revealed no significant differences between the NLP and DL (NLP > DL) groups at either post-test or retention (both p = 0.999). Therefore, it is suggested to the practitioners to manipulate key task constraints to provide more exploration and flexibility, while recognizing that both NLP and DL can be effective approaches in recreational futsal training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orangi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: