Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates parameter space and linearization of σ-equivariant magmas, highlighting selection processes.
We study the finite parameter space of σ-equivariant row-graded magmas on M = S × S, where S = 𝔽₃ (equivalently, the point set of the affine plane AG(2,3)), subject to left-row output and a fixed same-row off-diagonal Steiner rule. The parameter space admits a normal form Ω′ ≅ S¹⁸ × S³ ≅ S²¹ of cardinality 3²¹ = 10 460 353 203. Two finite enumeration theorems completely map the ambient space. The associativity spectrum satisfies 63 ≤ Assoc ≤ 597, with exact endpoint loci and the full partition function. The path-resolved Hamming defect satisfies min H_tot = −2268, max H_tot = 7302, and maxN₋=0 H_tot = 7020. Inside this parameter space, the four internal finite conditions 𝒽_acc = 0, H_diag = 0, (r,r)² = (r,r), StabMaps_R = {C,J} select a unique point — the right-row projection magma RP. After selection, RP admits a complete finite linearization profile: rank-three left translations, a 51-element left-translation semigroup, an explicit endomorphism and intertwiner classification, the binary part of the term clone (size 630), a row-sum contraction matrix realization, a Hamming-defect operator identity, associated compact Lie groups (SU(3), SU(2), U(1)), and a signed symplectic lift of the C/J right-stabilizer geometry. The theorem package is organized as finite parameter space ⟹ intrinsic finite selection ⟹ linearization of RP. All finite claims are supported by exhaustive certificate files available in the public GitHub repository (see “Finite certificate protocol” in the paper).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burundai Taryi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: