Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates steric hindrance effects on tribological performance of phosphate esters, suggesting a new design strategy.
Traditional trial-and-error approaches to studying the lubrication mechanisms of extreme-pressure (EP) antiwear additives are costly and time-consuming. ReaxFF molecular dynamics simulations combined with macroscopic tribological experiments were employed to elucidate the regulatory effect of substituent steric hindrance on phosphate ester tribological performance and unravel the atomic-scale tribofilm formation process on iron oxide surfaces. Polyphosphates were identified as the core component governing EP performance: reduced steric hindrance enhanced phosphate ester adsorption on the metal oxide surface, evidenced by increased Fe–H, Fe–C and C–O interfacial bonds that formed a denser initial adsorption layer. This enhanced adsorption promoted active site-surface contact, driving molecular multistage decomposition and carbon skeleton reorganization; generated phosphorus-containing and p-methylphenoxyl radicals synergistically facilitated efficient polyphosphate formation. The simulated atomistic tribofilm formation mechanism was experimentally validated by QCM-D, SEM-EDS and XPS analyses of interfacial adsorption and tribofilm composition. This work clarifies the mechanistic link between molecular steric hindrance, interfacial tribochemical reactions and EP performance, proposes a rational molecular design strategy for high-performance phosphate-based EP additives, and advances fundamental understanding of organic–inorganic interfacial tribochemistry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rui et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: