Comparative analysis demonstrates optimized energy efficiency in modular construction using various insulation materials.
This article presents a multi-criteria comparative analysis of modern wall partitions in light-frame technology, with a focus on highly energy-efficient modular construction. The motivation for this research stems from the critical need to optimize building thermal insulation materials to minimize heat loss, while simultaneously ensuring low structural weight, rapid assembly, and hygrothermal safety in prefabricated systems. The aim of this study is to identify the most advantageous insulating materials and structural configurations by evaluating their thermal transmittance, moisture behavior, thermal dynamics, and fire resistance. The analysis encompassed four structural variants paired with seven types of advanced and conventional insulation materials. This comprehensive matrix allowed for the development of 28 computational models. Simulations were carried out for severe winter climatic conditions in Poland, utilizing the Ubakus software and conforming to the PN-EN ISO 13788, PN-EN ISO 6946, PN-EN 12524, and DIN 4108-3 standards. The simulations assumed strict steady-state boundary conditions for a 90-day condensation period, with an external profile of −14 °C/80% RH and an internal climate of 20 °C/50% RH. The evaluation focused on key physical and energy parameters, including the heat transfer coefficient (U-value), condensation risk, diffusion resistance, thermal phase shift, and partition weight. Quantitative findings reveal that the ventilated system with resol foam insulation (variant 4d) yielded the best overall performance, achieving a U-value of 0.089 W/(m2·K) W/(m2·K). The results confirm that the strategic selection of high-performance thermal insulation materials, coupled with structural thermal bridge mitigation, significantly enhances the energy efficiency, thermal stability, and moisture resistance of lightweight enclosures, establishing a comprehensive comparative framework for optimizing modular building envelopes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brenk et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: