Key result
Pre-existing CVD linked to ~35% fewer primary surgeries in older women with early breast cancer.
Why the study?
Inferior survival outcomes in older women with operable ER-positive breast cancer might be explained by underuse of surgery, with rates varying considerably between UK geographical regions.
Does pre-existing cardiovascular disease and patient case-mix explain regional geographical variations in the rate of primary breast surgery in older women with early ER-positive breast cancer?
Observational (n=33,235)
Yes
Does pre-existing cardiovascular disease and patient case-mix explain regional geographical variations in the rate of primary breast surgery in older women with early ER-positive breast cancer?
Regional variations in surgical treatment rates for older women with early breast cancer are largely explained by patient case-mix, including age, cancer stage, and pre-existing cardiovascular and other comorbidities.
CVD and comorbidities largely explain regional surgery variation; leaves open whether targeted comorbidity management alters uptake in older women.
INTRODUCTION: Women over 70 years of age with operable oestrogen receptor positive (ER positive) breast cancer have worse survival outcomes than younger women. Primary surgery is the optimal treatment with primary endocrine therapy reserved for patients who are unfit or who have multiple co-morbidities. Inferior outcomes in this patient population might be explained by underuse of surgery, the rates of which vary considerably between geographical regions in the UK. We determined the rates of surgery versus primary endocrine therapy in a cohort of women aged over 70 in England, with potentially curable ER positive breast cancer, according to the presence of pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD), comorbidities, social deprivation, and by geographical location. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 33,235 women aged 70 years or older with stage I to III ER positive breast cancer from the 20 regional NHS Cancers Alliances in England were identified from the cancer registry. Linked hospital records were used to identify patient demographics, tumour and treatment characteristics, resection rates, CVD prevalence and other co-morbidities. RESULTS: 25,800 (77.6 %) patients underwent surgery, 6787 (20.4 %) patients received primary endocrine therapy alone, 648 (2 %) patients received no treatment. Both CVD and surgery prevalence varied by geographical location. After adjustment for case mix the differences between Cancer Alliances attenuated and no longer reached statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: We found regional differences in rates of surgery in patients with breast cancer across different centres. After adjustments, the variation is largely attributable to case mix. Under recording of endocrine therapy data in secondary care limits full interpretation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crewe et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Early (ER positive HER2 negative) breast cancer (n=33,235). Pre-existing cardiovascular disease vs. No cardiovascular disease was evaluated on Rate of primary surgery (p=<0.001). Pre-existing cardiovascular disease was associated with significantly lower rates of primary surgery (53.3% vs 82.3%) in older women with early breast cancer, and accounted for much of the observed regional variation in surgical treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: